TO: ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
FROM: BRAD JOHNSON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: APRIL 24, 2024
SUBJECT:
Title
PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF REVISED CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN FOR THE CLAREMONT COLLEGES EAST CAMPUS, TO BE RENAMED THE ROBERTS CAMPUS EAST SPORTS BOWL - APPLICANT: CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE
Body
SUMMARY
On June 15, 2016, the Architectural Commission recommended approval of a Conceptual Site Plan for the Claremont Colleges East Campus project. The City Council then approved the Conceptual Site Plan along with the related Parcel Map, Development Agreement, and Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) on November 8, 2016. Claremont McKenna College (CMC) is now requesting approval of a revised Conceptual Site Plan that modifies the design and addresses ownership changes of the parcels. The new plan is slightly less intense than the previous plan and includes renaming the site Roberts Campus East and the athletic components of the Roberts Campus Sports Bowl (Sports Bowl).
The Architectural Commission is asked to provide an advisory review of the proposed revisions prior to the City making a final decision on the Project. Depending on the scope of the final revisions to the Development Agreement and EIR, the final approval may be made by either the City Manager or the City Council. In either case, comments from the Commission will be considered prior to any approvals. In addition, once the project is entitled, CMC will finalize the design of the project and bring forward detailed plans including lighting and landscape plans for final approval by the Architectural Commission.
The site is bounded on the north by Foothill Boulevard, on the east by Monte Vista Avenue, on the south by Sixth Street/Arrow Route, and the west by Claremont Boulevard. The Los Angeles/San Bernardino County line runs diagonally through the property from the southwest to the northeast with approximately 30 acres located in the City of Claremont and the remaining 45 acres located in the City of Upland. The property was previously owned by the Claremont University Consortium (CUC) but has recently been purchased in its entirety by Claremont McKenna College (CMC), which previously was the intended owner of 41 acres of the East Campus. The 74-acre site is a former rock quarry more recently approved as an inert landfill that CMC is in the process of formally closing.
Both the approved and the proposed Conceptual Site Plans identify general locations for planned facilities and improvements that include recreation and athletic fields, bleachers, support facilities, and parking. The Sports Bowl would be located on approximately 66.4 of the 74 acres. No development is proposed on three parcels totaling 7.58 acres located at the south end of the site, adjacent to West Arrow Route. This land, approximately seven acres of which is located in Upland, is intended to be left vacant until future uses are identified and approved. A multi-page written description of the project is Attachment A and a Conceptual Site Plan and supplemental detail sheets are Attachment B to this report.
Staff is supportive of the Revised Conceptual Site Plan, as it is more attractive, provides a less intensive use of the land, creates a vastly superior layout that takes better advantage of the site’s topography and mountain views, significantly decreases impermeable surfaces to allow more landscaping and improved stormwater catchment, and includes a vastly improved access plan that includes a pedestrian tunnel linking the project directly to the CMC Campus.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommended Action
Staff recommends the Architectural Commission review the proposed revisions and provide comments and direction to the applicant and staff regarding the Conceptual Site Plan for the Claremont McKenna College Roberts East Campus Sports Bowl project based on the applicable criteria in Municipal Code section 16.300.060.
Body
ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDATION
In addition to the recommendation, there are the following alternatives:
A. Continue discussion of the Conceptual Site Plan for additional information.
B. Recommend the Conceptual Site Plan not be approved and identify the reasons to support the negative recommendation.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
The applicant is responsible for all costs associated with the City’s review of this project. The costs of City staff, City Attorney, and consultant time spent on this project are charged against a deposit paid by the applicant.
ANALYSIS
CMC has submitted applications to both the City of Claremont and the City of Upland regarding the proposed revisions to the previously approved Conceptual Site Plan. Each City has discretionary approval power over the portion of the project that is within its borders. To address the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CMC is also working with both cities to determine the appropriate approach to address the changes. Traffic, hydrology, noise, and airport safety reports have been or will be completed for each City to consider, prior to making any final decisions. This process is likely to result in an addendum to the FEIR for the Project. There are no significant changes being proposed for the approved Parcel Maps for the site. At this time five minor modifications to the Claremont Development Agreement are proposed to revise the project phasing, timing of off-site improvements, and establishment of cross-jurisdictional services. A summary of these changes and a detailed description of the broader project are included in Attachments A and B.
BACKGROUND
The original design of the East Campus Conceputual Site Plan was approved by the City Council on November 8, 2016. A copy of the previously approved Conceptual Site Plan is Attachment C. City Council Resolution 2016-75 approving the Conceptual Site Plan is Attachment D.
The Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the East Campus project was certified by the Upland City Council on May 23, 2016. The FEIR analyzed the potential impacts of the project. With the implementation of mitigation measures, all identified impacts of the East Campus project could be mitigated to below levels of significance, except for noise impacts to surrounding uses and the project site in the City of Upland, caused by increases in traffic generated noise and operation noise in the City of Upland. Noise impacts in the City of Claremont would be less than significant. A Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted by the Upland City Council found that the social, economic, and environmental benefits of the project outweigh the identified potential significant and unavoidable impacts of the project.
Prior to any construction within the East Campus, specific development projects would be subject to the review process of the jurisdiction in which the development is located. Development that extends into both jurisdictions would be subject to the review processes of both Claremont and Upland. All building footprints, building designs and details, landscaping, and other site features of development located within Claremont will require future review and approval by the Architectural Commission.
Site and Zoning Summary:
Existing Use of Property: Class III landfill (former quarry site)
General Plan Designation: Claremont: Institutional
Upland: Institutional
Zoning: Claremont: Institution Educational (IE)
Upland: Public/Institution (PB/I)
Surrounding Land Uses:
North: Gas station, plant nursery, vacant
Northeast: Business park
East: Retail and service commercial, residential, groundwater recharge basin
Southeast: Rock and sand recycling
South: Retail commercial, residential
Southwest: CMC buildings and sports facilities
West: College student housing, sports fields, new academic sciences building
Northwest: Gas station, retail commercial
Project Description
The revised Conceptual Site Plan has been designed by Bjarke Ingels Group, the globally renowned architecture firm that recently completed the design of the CMC Robert Day Sciences Center now under construction immediately west, across Claremont Boulevard. The revisions being made are primarily to address changing needs and budgets at each of the participating institutions. The primary change is a larger than anticipated endowment to CMC to fund their portion of the project whereas before all participating institutions lacked the funds to develop the project in the originally anticipated time frame.
Both the original and revised plans have been designed to utilize the existing topography and landforms of the former quarry to minimize cut and fill operations, and take advantage of the natural grade elevations to develop athletic fields, lights, and spectator areas with reduced impacts to surrounding development. The revised plan has a revised grading plan designed to make better use of the terrain to provide for natural stormwater catchment facilities that are incorporated throughout the site. The revised Sports Bowl project is planned to be developed in two phases, with Phase 1 being the southern half of the site and Phase 2 being the northern half of the site.
East Campus Existing Entitlements and Proposed Revisions
Previously approved entitlements for the East Campus are described below along with the proposed revisions, which are italicized and bolded for the reader’s convenience.
Claremont Portion of Project:
§ TPM 70243: Subdivides 29.14 acres in Claremont into three parcels, based on the Conceptual Site Plan. Previously these parcels were intended to be transferred to Pitzer College (Parcel 1), CMC (Parcel 2), and CUC (Parcel 3). Note: CUC has since changed its name to The Claremont Colleges Services (TCCS). There are no changes to the Claremont Parcel Map; however, CMC is now the owner of all three parcels. A copy of the Claremont Parcel Map (# 70243) is Attachment E.
§ Conceptual Site Plan:
o Parcel 1: Planned facilities for Parcel 1 included two multi-purpose fields, a basketball court, a volleyball court, a tennis court, ancillary facilities, and a parking lot with approximately 375 spaces adjacent to Claremont Boulevard. The revised plan would now include two multi-purpose fields and approximately 170 parking spaces.
o Parcel 2: Planned facilities included a portion of a below-grade baseball field that would extend into Upland, a golf practice area, and a parking lot with approximately 200 spaces at street level adjacent to Claremont Boulevard; all were included and approved as part of the CMC Master Plan in 2012. The revised plan includes 470 parking spaces in a two-level partially subterranean parking structure and the same partial baseball field, however, the golf practice area has been relocated to the Upland side of the project to accommodate the reorientation of the baseball and softball fields to face north. The parking for Parcels 1 & 2 continue to take their primary access of Claremont Boulevard at 9th Street, where a new four-way traffic signal is proposed to be installed at the beginning of the project. Because the parking lot has been condensed and moved south, the northern driveway into the parking lot has been eliminated.
o Parcel 3: Planned facilities included a portion of a future recreation field, which would extend into Upland. The proposed revision simply designates this area as “undeveloped land” as the final use of this property has not yet been determined.
§ Development Agreement between CUC and the City of Claremont: This legal agreement provides for the phased development of the site in Claremont, timing of off-site improvements, and potential establishment of joint services and cross-jurisdictional services. In conjunction with this proposal, five minor modifications to the Claremont Development Agreement are proposed, which relate mostly to the timing of off-site improvements, and establishment of cross-jurisdictional services but also include deletion of references to a permanent access point along Arrow Route. These changes are summarized in Exhibit C of Attachment A (Project Description).
Upland Portion of Project:
§ TPM18989: Subdivided 45.30 acres in Upland into six lots, based on the Conceptual Master Site Plan. Ownership of Lot 4 was intended to be transferred to CMC with CUC retaining ownership of remaining lots. The Upland parcel map has not changed, however, CMC is now the owner of all six parcels.
§ Conceptual Master Site Plan:
o Parcels 1-3: Originally, these three parcels, located in the northeast portion of the site, were intended to remain vacant until future uses could be defined and approved. Two recreational fields, a small field house, and a 30-space parking lot adjacent to Sixth Street/Arrow Route. The planned future use of these parcels was not particularly feasible given their extreme topography and location at a significant stormwater outflow source. The revised plan works with this topography by incorporating the area into the sloped perimeter of the Sports Bowl and allowing the stormwater to flow into a series of water infiltration areas.
o Parcel 4: Parcel 4 was intended to be developed by CMC to include a baseball field that would extend over the City boundary into Claremont, softball field, football and track field, archery field, Argentinean Paddle Board court, ancillary facilities, parking lot with approximately 141 spaces, and large retention basin. The revised plan includes the baseball field that extends over the City boundary, a softball field, a golf practice facility, a football and track field, and ancillary facilities consisting of bleachers for each field, a press box for the track/football field, three small field houses, and a parking lot with approximately 124 parking spaces. Both the Baseball and Softball fields have been re-oriented to face north to improve shade patterns for bleachers and dugouts and take advantage of the impressive mountain views from the site.
§ Development Agreement between CUC and the City of Upland: This legal agreement provides for the phased development of the site in Upland, timing of off-site improvements, and potential establishment of joint services and cross-jurisdictional services. In conjunction with this proposal, six minor modifications to the Upland Development Agreement are proposed, which relate mostly to the timing of off-site improvements, and establishment of cross-jurisdictional services, but also include deletion of references to a permanent access point along Arrow Route. These changes are summarized in Exhibit C of Attachment A (Project Description).
All components of the projects in Upland were previously approved by the Upland City Council on May 23, 2016, and the proposed changes are also being reviewed by the City of Upland concurrent with this review. The proposed revisions are under review by the City of Upland.
Retention basin and stormwater infiltration system
The approved Concept Site Plan utilized a large on-site retention basin in the south portion of the site to collect water from most of the site. Water was intended to be concentrated and retained here and eventually infiltrate into the ground. The new plan includes a more distributed system of bioswales, dry ponds, and subterranean chambers to infiltrate the bulk of stormwater over a larger area of the project. It also uses an area occupied by three multi-purpose fields located in the deepest portion of the pit as a secondary retention basin that would be used only in extreme rain events. Riparian plantings will be located in close proximity to the bioswales and dry ponds.
Landscaped Slopes
The approved Conceptual Site Plan includes slopes adjacent to Monte Vista Boulevard, Foothill Boulevard, and on the east side of the proposed parking lots. The landscape design for those slopes was intended to include alluvial fan and willow scrub plantings. The revised plan expands the area of these landscaped slopes by approximately 12 acres and includes permeable walking trails that loop the entire Sports Bowl Site and meander up and down the slope to provide access, vistas, and a natural look for the landscape.
Summary of Improvements in Existing and Proposed Conceptual Site Plans
Table 1 below provides a summary of the facilities/improvements contained in both the existing and proposed Conceptual Site Plans:
Table 1

Off-site Improvements
The following off-site improvements are required to be constructed along the four streets adjacent to the site. The timing of these improvements is tied to Development Agreements with the Cities of Claremont and Upland. These improvements include:
§ Foothill Boulevard: CMC has already provided substantial funding to the City to install the required improvements on 75 percent of the Project’s frontage along Foothill Boulevard. The project will be required to complete these improvements along the Upland portion of the site. These improvements include sidewalk, curb and gutter, protected bike lane, parkway landscaping, street trees, streetlights, perimeter fencing, underground utilities, a storm drain extension, asphalt travel lane pavement, island median curb, and, if appropriate, island median landscaping.
§ Claremont Boulevard: CMC is required to provide sidewalk, parkway landscaping, streetlights, underground utilities, corner monument signs, and bus stop shelters and facilities. In 2022, the City and CMC modified the design of these improvements to include Class 4 “protected” bicycle lanes, ladder-style crosswalks, and extended “bulbed-out corner plantings” to improve pedestrian safety. The design is intended to implement the City’s Complete Streets Policy and match the improvements installed on Foothill Boulevard in 2020.
§ Monte Vista Avenue: CMC is required to provide sidewalk, parkway landscaping, street trees, streetlights, perimeter fencing, island median landscaping, underground utilities, and corner monument signs.
§ Sixth Street/Arrow Route: CMC is required to provide sidewalk, parkway landscaping, street trees, perimeter fencing, and underground utilities.
Relationship to CMC Master Plan
The CMC Master Plan was approved by the Claremont City Council in 2012 to provide a long-range guide for future improvements and expansion of the CMC campus over 30 years. It is independent of the East Campus Conceptual Plan, which was initiated by the Claremont University Consortium, not CMC. However, the CMC Master Plan does reference 41 acres of the East Campus and designates the relocation of certain facilities from the main CMC campus to the East Campus.
As noted above, CMC has now purchased the entire East Campus site and plans to develop roughly the same level of facilities and parking as were previously included in the CMC Master Plan despite the increased amount of available land. There are, however, two minor projects that are not currently proposed in the Sports Bowl that are included in the Master Plan. These are an archery range and an Argentinian paddle tennis court. These are relatively small facilities that may still be constructed on the East Campus or perhaps moved to an alternative location on the main campus. Because the vast majority of the planned facilities are being implemented by the revised Conceptual Site Plan for the Roberts Campus East and Sports Bowl, staff finds that the proposed revisions are consistent with the CMC Master Plan.
A separate EIR was prepared and certified by the City for the 2012 CMC Master Plan. The Architectural Commission reviewed the Draft EIR for the CMC Master Plan and the CMC Master Plan document on January 11, 2011. During that review, members of the Architectural Commission unanimously voiced their support for the CMC Master Plan including the portion of the Master Plan incorporating a large portion of the East Campus.
Claremont Boulevard Complete Streets Improvements
As described above, the East Campus project is required to provide public improvements to the east side of Claremont Boulevard. The CMC Master Plan requires similar improvements to the west side of the street. In 2020, CMC and TCCS approached the City to discuss a revised street plan to improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists on Claremont Boulevard. The resulting design incorporates “Complete Streets” strategies including narrowing vehicle travel lanes, protected bicycle lanes, improved pedestrian crossings at Sixth and Ninth Streets including ladder-style crosswalks and corner bulb outs, enlarged parkways, and new landscaping. The Architectural Commission reviewed the conceptual plan for the Claremont Boulevard Improvements in July 2021 and supported the changes.
The Claremont Boulevard improvements are required to be developed by conditions of approval for East Campus as well as the new Robert Day Sciences Center building. A separate parcel map is being required as a condition of approval of the Science Center to provide adequate right-of-way and/or easement space for the improvements on the west side of Claremont Boulevard between Sixth and Ninth Streets.
Previous Review by Architectural Commission
The Architectural Commission originally reviewed the East Campus Conceptual Site Plan on June 15, 2016, and voted unanimously to recommend approval with an emphasis that the applicant consider the following details:
1. Screening of parking around the site;
2. If perimeter fencing is absolutely necessary, ensure that it is appropriately designed to enhance the streetscape and promote existing viewsheds;
3. Taking into account existing trees and appropriate slope-supporting landscape;
4. Understanding that the plan may need to be revised in the future in order to accommodate all existing mitigation measures; and
5. The streetscape be fully addressed through Architectural Commission future review.
The minutes from the Jun 15, 2016, Architectural Commissions are Attachment F. Staff notes that the streetscape that has been installed along Foothill Boulevard were reviewed and approved by the Architectural Commission as part of the Foothill Boulevard Master Plan and associated construction. As noted above, the concept plan for the streetscape improvements for Claremont Boulevard were reviewed and supported by the Architectural Commission in July 2021. The final design of those improvements and associated right-of-way landscaping are expected to be brought forward to the Architectural Commission prior to construction. Streetscapes on Arrow Route and Monte Vista Avenue are located in Upland and will be reviewed by the City of Upland.
Basis for Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Architectural Commission support approval of the revised Conceptual Site Plan as the revised plan is in conformity with the City’s development regulations, Zoning Ordinance, and General Plan, and is consistent with the applicable review criteria of Municipal Code section 16.300.060 as follows:
Zoning and Development Standards Conformity: The revised Conceptual Site Plan conforms to the development regulations of the property’s Institutional Educational (IE) zoning and represents a less intensive use of the East Campus site as several of the smaller sports facilities are being removed from the plan in favor of increased walking paths and native plantings.
General Plan Consistency: The revised Conceptual Site Plan is consistent with the property’s Institutional designation as it provides for the development and enhancement of the campus of a private college. The revisions are also consistent with and help achieve the following goals and policies of the City’s General Plan:
§ Goal 2-1. Make Claremont a model for the application of sustainable development practices as several of the smaller sports facilities are being removed from the plan and the parking is being consolidated into a two-level parking structure to increase space available for permeable walking paths and native plantings.
§ Policy 2-4.1. Encourage the preservation of different types of open spaces as the revised plan includes a more natural design with increased open space and native planted areas. The cohesive and natural concept design will be unique from other open spaces in the City and region.
§ Policy 2-4.3. Require creative and attractive open space to be incorporated into development projects, as the revised design is highly creative and designed to be extraordinarily attractive by a renowned design firm.
§ Policy 2-9.1. Provide crosswalks and sidewalks along streets that are accessible for people with disabilities and people who are physically challenged as the new street improvements, especially those along Foothill Boulevard and Claremont Boulevard are designed to meet the City’s new “Complete Streets” policy while also meeting all new accessibility standards for public streets and sidewalks.
§ Policy 2-10.2. Make walking comfortable at intersections through traffic-calming, landscaping, and designed crosswalks as the revised Claremont Boulevard improvements include ladder-style crosswalks and bulbed-out intersection planters. In addition, the proposed addition of a pedestrian tunnel is expected to eliminate the need for a majority of the pedestrian trips to cross Claremont Boulevard to access the Sports Bowl.
§ Goal 2-12. Create distinctive places throughout Claremont as the unique and iconic design of the revised Conceptual Site Plan will be highly distinctive and consist of a bold and attractive design.
§ Policy 2-12.3. Encourage new developments to incorporate drought-tolerant and native landscaping that is pedestrian friendly, attractive, and consistent with the landscaped character of Claremont as the proposed conceptual landscape plan includes extensive use of native and drought-tolerant plants and increases the area available for native plants by several acres.
§ Policy 4-2.5. Provide medians on all major and secondary streets with sufficient right-of-way, and use bulb-outs and pedestrian refuge medians where appropriate, as the revised plan incorporates bulb outs on Claremont Boulevard.
§ Policy 4-6.2. Require The Claremont Colleges and other institutions to provide parking in a manner that minimizes the impact on adjacent neighborhoods, in that the revised plan relocates a large amount of parking to be closer to the Ninth Street crossing and pedestrian bridge, where it will be adjacent to the Colleges and away from non-college land uses.
Compatibility with Surrounding Uses and Development: The proposed revisions are compatible with surrounding uses, which include college uses to the west, automobile service and commercial to the north, commercial and residential uses to the east, and retail commercial and residential to the south and the plan is a minor revision to an existing plan that reduces the intensity of the development, introduces a tunnel to create a grade separation for a large portion of the pedestrian crossings and reduce traffic disruptions to Claremont Boulevard, and relocates some parking to a partially subterranean parking structure to take advantage of the convenience of the new tunnel. In addition, all future development in the project area is subject to the City’s architectural review to further provide that development would contribute positively to the City’s physical environment.
Internal Circulation: The revised Conceptual Site Plan includes a vast improvement to the internal circulation of the Project by providing a more organized plan for the athletic fields and an intuitive network of circular walkways and roadways that connect all facilities to the primary project entries at Ninth Street and the pedestrian tunnel. In addition, parking has been moved from the center of the Sports Bowl to the parking structure in order to reduce paving as well as pedestrian/vehicle conflicts within the project. The proposed revisions eliminate a planned driveway entrance along Claremont Boulevard because the parking lot footprint has been reduced and another driveway entrance along Arrow Route has been moved to Monte Vista Avenue to provide more direct access to the small parking lot on that side of the project.
Sustainability: The planned revisions greatly reduce the amount of non-permeable surfaces and increase the area available for native landscapes and will incorporate “double piping” so that the project can connect to recycled water services when they become available.
CEQA REVIEW
This preliminary review is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2)-(3), 15061(b)(3), and 15378(a) of the CEQA Guidelines. On its own, this preliminary review will not result in a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The City will perform all necessary environmental reviews in connection with the final review of the proposed revisions to the Conceptual Site Plan, which is expected to include, at a minimum, an Addendum to the FEIR for the project. Therefore, no additional review is required at this time.
A Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (SCH#2010021040) for the East Campus project was certified by the Upland City Council on May 23, 2016. The City of Upland was designated as Lead Agency for purposes of preparing the EIR because the larger portion of the project is in Upland. The FEIR analyzed the potential impacts of the Master Plan project in accordance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and Upland and Claremont’s Local CEQA Guidelines. The FEIR includes mitigation to reduce identified environmental impacts of the Project. With implementation of mitigation measures, all identified impacts of the East Campus project could be mitigated to below levels of significance, except for noise impacts to surrounding uses and the project site in the City of Upland, caused by increases in traffic generated noise and operation noise in the City of Upland. Noise impacts would be less than significant in Claremont. A Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted by the Upland City Council on May 23, 2016, found that the social, economic, and environmental benefits of the East Campus project outweigh the identified potential significant and unavoidable impacts from the project. A Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted by the Upland City Council includes all feasible mitigation to reduce potential impacts from the Project as required by Public Resources Code Section 20181.6.
Prior to approving the Project Conceptual Plan and associated Tentative Parcel Map and Development Agreement on November 8, 2016, the Claremont City Council considered the adequacy of the FEIR and made the required findings. All mitigation measures from the FEIR were included as conditions of approval of the Claremont portion of the Project. Because the proposed revisions generally decrease the intensity of development and continue to comply with all applicable mitigation measures, the revisions are not expected to create a condition that has not already been analyzed and addressed in the FEIR
The MMRP for the Project is Attachment G. The FEIR and related Appendices are available on the City’s Website at: https://www.ci.claremont.ca.us/government/departments-divisions/planning-division/ceqa-documents
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
The agenda and staff report for this item have been posted on the City website and distributed to interested parties. If you desire a paper copy, please contact Melissa Sanabria at msanabria@ci.claremont.ca.us.
Additionally, notice of this preliminary review was sent to all property owners located within 300- feet of the subject property (the 74-acre site that includes the portion of the project located in the City of Upland) on Thursday, April 11, 2024. The Conceptual Site Plan and supporting documents for the project are available for public review at the Planning Division counter at City Hall and on the City website.
Submitted by: Prepared by:
Brad Johnson Christopher Veirs
Community Development Director Principal Planner
Attachments:
A - Project Description
B - Revised Conceptual Site Plan and Related Drawings
C - Previously Approved Conceptual Site Plan
D - City Council Resolution 2016-75
E - Parcel Map Number 70243
F - Minutes from June 15, 2016 Architectural Commission Meeting
G - East Campus FEIR Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program