TO: ARCHITECTURAL AND PRESERVATION COMMISSION
FROM: BRAD JOHNSON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: JANUARY 28, 2026
SUBJECT:
Title
REVIEW OF HISTORICAL PROPERTY (MILLS ACT) AGREEMENT REQUEST #25-MA02 BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 746 HARVARD AVENUE. APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER(S) - MEGAN AND ANTHONY CLARK
Body
SUMMARY
The owners of the property at 746 Harvard Avenue have submitted a request to enter into a Historic Property (Mills Act) Agreement with the City. The Mills Act is a preservation tool enacted by the state legislature to ensure the long-term preservation of eligible historic properties and other significant site features of such properties. In return, property owners receive a reduction in taxes, which in turn helps finance needed repairs and renovations for the property. The Architectural and Preservation Commission is the recommending body for Mills Act requests. The Architectural and Preservation Commission recommendation is then forwarded to the City Council for final action on the agreement. Staff has reviewed the application and finds that each of the required criteria for entering into a Mills Act agreement, as established by the City Council, can be met.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommended Action
Staff recommends the Architectural and Preservation Commission:
A. Adopt a RESOLUTION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLAREMONT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF HISTORICAL PROPERTY (MILLS ACT) AGREEMENT #25-MA02 BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 746 HARVARD AVENUE - APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER(S): MEGAN AND ANTHONY CLARK; and
B. Find this item is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Body
ALTERNATIVES TO RECOMMENDATION
In addition to the staff recommendation, there are the following alternatives:
A. Continue the discussion and request additional information.
B. Express the intent to recommend denial of the Mills Act contract, specifically identifying the criteria that cannot be met, and continue the item to February 11, 2026, for adoption of the denial recommendation resolution.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
The costs associated with the review of this application have been borne by the applicant.
ANALYSIS
Upon approval of a Mills Act historical property contract (Attachment A), the value of the subject property is reassessed based on a formula that considers the rental income that could be expected from the property, the Federal home loan interest rate, a historic property risk component, and an amortization component to result in a special Mills Act capitalization rate. The total tax savings for the property owners is determined by using the formula outlined in Attachment C, which also estimates the anticipated tax savings for the property owners/applicants. With approval of a Mills Act contract, the value of property tax savings must be put towards the scope of work, identified in Attachment A, to preserve or rehabilitate the historic character defining elements of the property and ensure its ongoing historical and structural integrity. Approval of a Mills Act contract will also result in a minor loss of tax revenue to the City. This loss represents the City’s contribution to ensuring the property’s preservation for the benefit of the community.
Staff has prepared estimates of the anticipated tax savings (Attachment C) for the owner and the loss in tax revenue to the City if the Mills Act agreement is approved. The calculations estimate a potential tax savings to the owners of $5,819 per year ($58,188.42 for ten years), and a potential loss to the City in tax revenue of $675 per year. In addition to the loss of revenue to the City, the contract will also result in a loss of tax revenue to the other local, regional, state agencies, and districts that receive a portion of property taxes paid.
Background
What is the Mills Act?
The Mills Act is a preservation tool created by the California state legislature in 1972 to encourage the preservation and restoration of historic properties. The Act enables cities to enter into historical property agreements with owners of qualifying properties to reduce owners’ property taxes in order to incentivize investment in their historic properties. While resulting in some lost tax revenue, the agreements provide benefits to cities in that they ensure preservation, high-quality rehabilitation, and maintenance of historic properties that represent important cultural resources.
As provided for by State law, the Mills Act is administered and implemented by local governments. Mills Act contracts are executed between the property owner and the local government granting the tax reduction. Cities have considerable discretion in evaluating Mills Act requests and are not mandated to approve historical property agreements. Each local government establishes its own eligibility criteria, application procedures, and the number of contracts to allow within its jurisdiction. The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) does not participate in the contract negotiations, is not a signatory to the contract, and has no authority over the administration of the Mills Act program.
City’s Mills Act Program
In October 2000, the City Council approved procedures and review criteria for agreements for properties in Claremont. Initially, the program was restricted to historic properties suffering severe deterioration and in danger of near-term demolition or eventual demolition due to long term neglect. In January 2009, the City Council revised the review criteria to include all residential properties listed in the City’s Register of Structures of Historic and Architectural Merit of the City of Claremont (Register). In addition, the Council limited the maximum number of Mills Act contracts that can be approved to six per year.
On October 9, 2012, the City Council amended the program once more to provide clarification to one of the review criteria and to establish an annual compliance review fee. These newly revised criteria and procedures are included as Attachment D (City Council Resolution 2012-75).
Property Description
The subject property is located on the southeast corner of Harvard Avenue and Eighth Street. The property has a General Plan Designation of Residential 6 and is zoned Historic Claremont - 7,500 square foot lot size (HC 7,500).
Located at 746 North Harvard Avenue and constructed in 1921, the residence is an example of Craftsman style architecture found in Claremont, which was a popular style built from 1905 to 1930.
The character-defining features of both the exterior and interior of the home were identified through a site visit to the property. The primary residence is a one-story, Craftsman bungalow-style structure with a natural stone foundation and shiplap siding. The front porch, which had been enclosed, was restored as a porch during the 2000’s. The restored porch features stone walls and columns. Defining features of the exterior include the low-pitched, cross-gabled roof with 2-foot overhangs, front porch with sloping square columns made of native fieldstone, fieldstone foundation, multi-light windows, and decorative gable beams. The interior shows signs of multiple renovations completed over the years. Changes include the restoration of the porch, a retiled fireplace that does not appear to be period appropriate, replacement of dining room built-ins with new cabinets and granite counters, and an enlarged kitchen and laundry. Also, stained glass was added in several areas, such as entrance doors and windows. The original wood windows appear to have been replaced in the 2000’s with double hung, faux multi-light windows that appear to be period appropriate, but are beginning to show their age as the faux muntins are detaching and the windows themselves are clearly not true multi-light windows.
Overall, the home is in relatively good shape and, with appropriate restoration and repair, can continue conveying its historical appearance and significance.
Proposed Work Plan
The applicants have proposed a sensible work plan that addresses both the home’s exterior and interior and will rehabilitate some of the home’s character defining features while also enhancing the structural integrity of the property and bringing portions of the home closer to their original historic appearance. A detailed summary of the proposed improvements is included in the Draft Mills Act Contract (Attachment A), with a summary provided here. With approval of a Mills Act Contract, the applicant would complete a reroof, extensive plumbing and sewer fixes, exterior painting, attic bracing, grading and drainage, structural repairs from rodent damage, interior paint, replacement of wood privacy fences, tree trimming and restoration and repair of the backdoor, hardwood floors, foundation, chimney, brickwork, and front porch stonework. The cost of the proposed work items would well exceed the property tax savings over ten years.
Qualifying Criteria and Staff Evaluation
Pursuant to Section 130 of City Council Resolution No. 2012-75, a historical property contract may be approved only if all the following criteria (shown below in italics) are met:
A. The subject property meets the eligibility requirements for a Mills Act contract pursuant to California Government Code Section 50280.1 in that it is a privately owned property which is not exempt from property taxation, and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, located in a National Register or local historic district, listed in a state or county official register of historic or architecturally significant sites, places or landmarks, or listed in the Register of Structures of Historic and Architectural Merit of the City of Claremont.
The subject property is privately owned by the applicants (Megan and Anthony Clark) and is not exempt from property taxation. The subject property is listed in the Register of Structures of Historic and Architectural Merit of the City of Claremont. The property’s architectural significance satisfies the Mills Act eligibility requirements.
B. The subject property contributes significantly to the quality, diversity, historical interest, and ambience of the community.
The existing residence contributes significantly to the quality, diversity, and historical ambience of Claremont. Constructed in 1921, the residence represents a solid example of Craftsman bungalow architecture, especially given its location on Harvard Avenue within the Historic Claremont neighborhood.
C. Significant features that defined the historical character of the subject property, and its buildings have not been destroyed or can be restored based on documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.
The significant character-defining features of the subject property have largely been preserved, though some repairs and restoration are needed to extend the life of the home and improve the historic integrity of the home. The more significant proposed work, such as the plumbing, sewer, foundation, and structural repairs in the ceilings, and grading/drainage work, will increase the livability of the residence and significantly reduce the potential for future damage to the residence. Furthermore, proposed work such as painting, door restoration, wood floor refinishing, stonework repair, and landscaping will further preserve the functionality and architecturally contributing features that define the property. The home exhibits a solid level of integrity in design, materials, workmanship, and setting. Its historic character has not been lost and, where necessary, can be restored using documentary and physical evidence such as that found in Attachment G.
D. The owner of the subject property proposes to make improvements that are related to preservation and/or rehabilitation of character defining elements and/or historical and structural integrity of the property. Additionally, the cost of such improvements must be equal to or greater than the expected property tax savings for the first ten years, which needs to be distributed into two five-year periods.
All improvements proposed by the applicant are related to either the preservation and/or rehabilitation of character defining elements, or the structural and historical integrity of the property, and improved livability of the home, and the estimated cost of these improvements exceeds the expected property tax savings. The details of the planned improvements are listed in Attachment F.
In completing the proposed work items with the benefit of a historical property contract, the property’s ability to continue contributing to the historical interest and ambience of the Claremont community will be enhanced. The applicant has proposed a sensible work plan that would help ensure the home’s long-term livability and restore some of its key historic features.
Based on estimates provided by the applicant, the total cost of the proposed scope of work is approximately $120,770, 207% of the estimated savings of $58,188 that would result from the historical property contract over a 10-year period. With the signing of the historical property contract, the applicant would be required to invest the avoided property tax into the work outlined in Attachment F. Additionally, based on the proposed scope of work, the applicant would be contributing more of their own funds into the proposed work than they would be saving through their reduced property taxes.
E. The subject property is residential.
The subject property is a single-family residential property located in the HC 7,500 zoning district. The property remains in residential use, consistent with the Mills Act’s residential eligibility criteria.
CEQA REVIEW
The proposed scheduled improvements within the contract are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15331 in that these improvements are for the restoration and rehabilitation of a historical resource, will be conducted in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards of the Office of Historic Preservation of the Department of Parks and Recreation, United States Secretary of the Interior’s Guidelines for Rehabilitation of Historic Properties, and the State Historical Building Code and will be subject to applicable City permitting requirements. Therefore, no further environmental review is necessary.
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
The agenda and staff report for this item have been posted on the City website and distributed to interested parties. If you desire a copy, please contact Melissa Sanabria at msanabria@claremontca.gov.
Notice of this project was published in the Claremont Courier on January 9, 2026. Copies of this staff report have been sent to the applicant and other interested parties.
Submitted by: Reviewed by:
Brad Johnson Christopher Veirs
Community Development Director City Planner
Prepared by:
Daniel Kim
Assistant Planner
Attachments:
A - Draft Mills Act Contract
B - Draft APC Resolution
C - Estimated Tax Savings Calculation
D - Adopted Procedures for Review and Approval of Historic Property Contracts
E - Photo Survey of the Subject Property
F - Improvement Plan
G - Historical Documents